Click on the logo below for the most complete Dirt Late Model coverage anywhere

For the Best RV Sales and Service


Rich's Articles & Blogs


« Dover offers a prize worth racing for | Main | Am I starting to believe those who say Junior is being slighted by his own team? »

G/W/C rule is a good thing but the manufactured uses of it are not

By admin | May 16, 2010

By Richard Allen

When talk first began a few years ago that NASCAR might consider the use of green/white/checkered finishes for the Sprint Cup division I was very much in favor of the practice. I believe fans deserve to see cars race across the finish line rather than coast across behind the pace car.

Unfortunately, finishes behind the pace still occurred even after the g/w/c rule was put in place.

So, when NASCAR considered the use of multiple g/w/c attempts, I was in favor of that move as well. I still am. I do not buy that the use of the practice is the cause of wrecked race cars. Drivers are the cause of wrecked race cars. And for that matter, as a fan I would rather see one of my favorites spin trying to win rather than never have a chance.

The trouble with the g/w/c rule is that NASCAR has become too fond of it. There has been an ESPNification of the sport as its leaders enjoy seeing their sport get SportsCenter highlights for close, bang-up finishes, even if those finishes are contrived.

As an example I point to Saturday’s Nationwide Series event in Dover. With but a few laps remaining, Mark Green suffered a flat tire and brushed the wall. His car made it off the track and out of harm’s way. The race could have ended under green but the caution flew anyway.

Jamie McMurray had a similar issue in the middle stretches of the Sprint Cup race on Sunday and no caution occurred. It was almost the same incident and one drew a yellow while the other did not. That leaves the sanctioning body open to question.

As it turns out, NASCAR got the very type of highlight it was hoping for when Denny Hamlin made contact with Clint Bowyer which set off a big chain reaction melee. And more, Bowyer later drove onto the track and slammed the side of Hamlin’s car in retaliation as the cars rode under caution.

There have been other instances since the inception of this rule in which it has been questionable as to whether a caution flag should even be waved.

I believe fans who make the effort to go to a race ought to be rewarded with a run to the checkered flag. For that reason, I am in favor of the green/white/checkered rule and the multiple uses of it. However, NASCAR must be careful in its decisions to ‘give the fans what they want’. Pro wrestling can be exciting even though it is scripted. Hopefully, NASCAR can be both exciting and legitimate.

Follow @RacingWithRich on twitter.

Richard Allen is a member of the National Motorsports Press Association. His weekly columns appear in The Mountain Press and The Knoxville Journal.

Topics: Articles |

3 Responses to “G/W/C rule is a good thing but the manufactured uses of it are not”

  1. Gina Says:
    May 17th, 2010 at 1:20 pm

    NASCAR’s desire to manipulate the end of the races to create an “exciting finish” because the racing itself is so often lackluster leaves me really cold. This type of manipulation is the reason why many people don’t consider NASCAR to be a real sport and contributes to people watching only the end of the reason because the rest of it “doesn’t matter”. NASCAR has created a monster (no pun intended).

  2. judy young Says:
    May 17th, 2010 at 10:48 pm

    My husband came home from work on Sat. and asked me how the Nationwide race went. I was watching it off and on but did catch on to the ‘fake caution’ near the end. I can see why fans only watch the last few laps.
    When there is a GWC it throws the rest of the race out the window and the grand prize is up for grabs for drivers who don’t deserve it. Exciting for whom?
    The GWC is just an extention of that stupid ‘Chase.’
    You can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can’t fool all of the people all of the time. NASCAR has totally lost whatever small amount of credibility it had left.

  3. Bill B Says:
    May 18th, 2010 at 6:57 am

    My problem with the GWC is that it lessens the importance of the first 90% of the race (as does the wave-around rule and the double file restart). Being the leader does not mean as much as it did in the past. In fact, being the leader has become a curse when there are multiple GWC and double file restarts. Those behind the leader can get fresh tires where the leader’s hand is kind of tied - they can’t give up the track position. So, someone gets four fresh tires and they restart 6th. The leader can probably hold them off for the first restart but if there is a second or third each gives the guy with fresh tires an additional opportunity. On each restart they gain 3 positions. Why don’t we just make the races 20 lap shoot outs and be done with it.