Click on the logo below for the most complete Dirt Late Model coverage anywhere

For the Best RV Sales and Service


Rich's Articles & Blogs


« My prediction: Denny Hamlin will win in Pocono | Main | 160 laps of boredom followed by 40 laps of terror »

Pocono exemplifies trouble with modern day NASCAR

By admin | June 3, 2010

By Richard Allen

This weekend the NASCAR Sprint Cup Series will head to the mountains of eastern Pennsylvania for the Gillette Fusion 500 at the Pocono Raceway. It used to be that a NASCAR trip to Pocono gave fans and competitors alike the chance to experience something different and intriguing. Now, this is just another race among a series of similar races.

Because of the 2.5 mile facility’s unusual shape, teams often used to experiment with unique ways of getting their car around the track faster than everybody else. Now, NASCAR has taken the ability to experiment away.

This track has three straights of varying lengths, two of which being among the longest on which these cars will compete all year. Because of that a few drivers began to shift gears to try and gain an advantage. Eventually, all teams started playing with transmissions and gear ratios that would allow drivers to shift multiple times per lap.

In-car cameras would allow fans to see exactly where the shift points were for each driver. It would be clearly evident that one driver gained an advantage in one particular section of the track while others might be better somewhere else.

Now, NASCAR mandates gear ratios in such a way that shifting is no longer part of the equation. Everybody is essentially the same.

The track also has three turns, each of which is different from the others in banking and radius. Again, just as with gears, teams would play around with set ups to try and outwit their competitors.

Some preferred to set their cars up to handle turn one best. In exchange, those drivers would have an advantage there but would have to give up something at the other end of the speedway. Some preferred setting their cars up to best handle turns two and three so they would experience the opposite of those who worked best in turn one.

Also, a few years ago some teams began really getting bold with the angles of camber they built into the front end of the cars. Camber refers to the angle of lean in or out the tires have in relation to the track surface. Those who figured out the right package bested the competition. Those who did not had flat tire after flat tire.

Now, NASCAR mandates the shocks, springs and camber angles on every car. Everybody is essentially the same.

So with all that said, this race has been made into a competition between cars that look exactly alike(except for those convincing stickers for headlights and taillights) with essentially the same set ups spread out all over an enormous track for far too long.

Just like every other 500 mile race on the circuit(except for the Daytona 500, Coke 600 and Southern 500) this race should have about 20% of the distance shaved off so that some of the riding around time can be avoided and drivers, fans and everyone else can get on to that inevitable late race caution and dash to the finish.

This used to be a fun race to watch with all sorts of intrigue. Now, it’s just a long ride in the beautiful countryside of eastern Pennsylvania.

Pocono used to be a track that allowed for creativity and experimentation. For that Matter, NASCAR used to be a sport that allowed for creativity and experimentation. Now, it’s just a contest of sameness.

Follow @RacingWithRich on twitter.

Richard Allen is a member of the National Motorsports Press Association. His weekly columns appear in The Mountain Press and The Knoxville Journal.

Topics: Articles |

5 Responses to “Pocono exemplifies trouble with modern day NASCAR”

  1. gopapa Says:
    June 4th, 2010 at 11:27 am

    Thanks for spelling it out like it is Rich. It’s sad, but true. I used to look forward to the races at Pocono, when they would run that Jericho transmission. Problem is, some of these races are just too long, and Pocono is one of them. Track operators don’t want to cut race distances for various reasons, but they need to start paying attention to what’s happening to the entire sport, not just their world. These cars of equality get strung out so quickly at tracks like Pocono and ACS, the fans in the stands have to endure too many parade laps twice a year!
    Auto Club Speedway bit the bullet and lopped a 100 miles off the fall race there. It’s time for Pocono to do the same, and some other venues need to follow suit.
    400 miles of follow the leader is enough.

  2. Richard in N.C. Says:
    June 4th, 2010 at 1:20 pm

    Except that it would compromise the intent of the story, it would have been well to at least have provided NASCAR’s reason for changing the rules for gears, etc. for Pocono.

  3. LB Says:
    June 4th, 2010 at 9:51 pm

    NASCAR needs to take a race away from Pocono anyway. That is one way to shorten the races there. And nobody will regret it except the Mattiolis and Jimmy Spencer.

  4. mkrcr Says:
    June 5th, 2010 at 1:16 pm

    The reason NA$CAR has mandated these rules is because they want a spec car series that is easier to police. I hope they have a spot reserved next to the IROC grave for their headstone.

  5. Charles Says:
    June 6th, 2010 at 6:11 am


    Cannot believe you think cutting off distance for any race will make it more exciting!!!!!!!

    You could apply the same logic to New Hampshire!!!!

    I agree that Nascar is over regulating the racing part!

    But just shorting races will never fix or cure the reason for boring races!!! and thats no incentive to lead laps,

    Pocono would be a great place to experiment ‘paying points to lead laps!!!!

    Has anyone seen a better race at New Hampshire than Pocono???????