Click on the DirtonDirt.com logo below for the most complete Dirt Late Model coverage anywhere

For the Best RV Sales and Service

*********************

Rich's Articles & Blogs

Meta


« Tough day for Kurt Busch…and everyone around him | Main | And the five inductees for the 2012 class of the NASCAR Hall of Fame should be… »

Why would NASCAR do anything about 2×2 racing?

By admin | April 18, 2011


By Richard Allen

With the Aaron’s 499 now in the rear view mirror there are just over two full months before the next restrictor plate race in Daytona on Independence Day weekend. If NASCAR were ever to do something that might change the 2X2 style of racing that has suddenly become the norm at Daytona and Talladega, this would be the time to do it.

NASCAR did not necessarily create this type of racing. It is more the product of the teams doing work on cooling system and other mechanical and aerodynamic factors. If the sanctioning body does want to change things they would have to make rulings in those areas.

But, why would they do anything about it?

NASCAR fans and media have often complained about the lack of passing for the lead in Sprint Cup races. There have been record numbers of lead changes in both races on the restrictor plate tracks so far in 2011.

NASCAR fans and media have often complained about a lack of excitement in Sprint Cup races. Sunday’s race was decided by .002 seconds with a four-wide finish. That’s pretty exciting.

But even with the number of lead changes and a blink of an eye finish, there were complaints about the racing in Talladega. As a matter of fact, there was a point in the race when Fox Network commentator Darrell Waltrip said, “You’ve gotta love this type of racing.” Upon hearing that, I asked my followers on twitter whether or not they did indeed love this type of racing. The response was overwhelmingly against the 2X2 tandems.

While the results of this poll are hardly scientific or official it reveals a strange quandary for NASCAR. Tandem racing has given fans and media what they have asked for but many fans and media do not seem to like it.

The problem most people seem to have(and the problem I myself have) is that the racing is so different from the norm and it just doesn’t look ‘natural’. Even the big packs previously created by restrictor plates seemed more appropriate to many fans than this.

During Sunday’s race my dad, a lifelong fan and one time racer himself, said, “This looks like a bunch of female dogs in heat being chased by a bunch of male dogs.” It just looks…weird. The selecting of partners and dumping of one for another seems more like the TV show Survivor than racing.

Also, I have to wonder if a deeper issue might be at stake here. Is the fact that the chances of ‘The Big One’ are greatly reduced play a role in people’s disdain for 2X2 tandems? Maybe mangled sheet metal is part of the draw for Talladega and Daytona.

NASCAR has been ever trending toward making the sport into a made for ESPN SportsCenter highlight package for some time now. The record numbers of lead changes combined with slow motion, high resolution photo finishes and a crash or two mixed in are exactly what they are looking for.

So again, why would NASCAR do anything about 2X2 racing at Daytona and Talladega?

Follow @RacingWithRich on twitter and Facebook by clicking on the icon of either social network on the left side of the page.

Please check out other stories of interest under ‘Rich’s Articles and Blogs’ in the left hand column of this page.

Topics: Articles |

7 Responses to “Why would NASCAR do anything about 2×2 racing?”

  1. SB Says:
    April 19th, 2011 at 5:41 am

    Part of the problem is that, in reality, with the ‘new’ racing, there are only 21 1/2 cars racing for the win. Since you need to have bumpers plastered together to stay fast enough, the ‘pusher’ has virtually no chance at winning the race. You just cut the field in half. If you know your driver isn’t going to have a shot to win, where’s the excitement?

  2. Bill B Says:
    April 19th, 2011 at 6:07 am

    The 2×2 racing sucks. The only good thing about it is that it only comes into play 4 times during the season (which is 4 times too many).

  3. Nascarxtm Says:
    April 19th, 2011 at 10:39 am

    I just want to say I love your Dad. He nailed it.

  4. Sue Rarick Says:
    April 19th, 2011 at 11:27 am

    I watched the Daytona 500 all the way through. Mostly because it was so new that I thought maybe it would grow on me. Then about 5 min. into the natonwide race I decided that a nap was a better option to watching the race and on Sunday we went shopping and got home in time for the last 20 miles.

    My plans for Daytona II and Talladega II are to find something else to do and maybe catch the last 10-20 laps.

    I’ve been a fan since the late 50’s yet open enough to have supported the COT.

  5. Justin Says:
    April 19th, 2011 at 1:44 pm

    I disagree that you are cutting the field in half with this type of racing. 48/88 were running mid pack to avoid wrecks, and they had anywhere from 12″ to 3 car lengths between them, and they were running lap times equal to the leaders. That proved that running nose to tail, pushing the guy in front, helps you go faster for a short period of time, but then you end up going slower for a period of time. When it all averages out, the 2 cars that were running a car length apart (48/88) were just as close to the leaders as they were before….

  6. loose nut Says:
    April 19th, 2011 at 3:55 pm

    What really sucks is if you are a two car team and your buddy gets crashed or wrecks you are done. Ilike the old way better because you are glued for three hours waiting to see what was going to happen. If I wanted to see just speed I would watch NHRA.

  7. Joseph Workman Says:
    April 20th, 2011 at 3:10 pm

    This is ARK racing, they line up by two’s like the ark.