By admin | April 24, 2011
By Richard Allen
Iâ€™m sure that at some time every race fan has heard a non-race fan say something to the effect of, â€œThe only reason people watch racing is to see the wrecks.â€
I would like to think that true race fans never want to see anyone get hurt. But, is a little bent sheet metal necessary for excitement? Do fans want to see sparks fly and smoke boil, whether from the cars or the competitors themselves?
The reason I pose these questions is because of two races held so far in the 2011 NASCAR season. For the most part the racing has been good this year and there have been some interesting storylines to emerge as the young season has played out. But two tracks, Bristol and Talladega, have still managed to draw criticism from a significant number of fans.
After receiving comments from several people who complained that, â€œThey ruined the trackâ€ after Marchâ€™s Bristol race and those who said, â€œI hate the two by two racingâ€ after Talladega, I wondered if the lack of wrecks on two tracks that had become noted for such has played a part in fansâ€™ new found disdain for speedways that were once favorites.
After the track was resurfaced and the banking altered at the Bristol Motor Speedway in 2007, the number of yellow flags has decreased dramatically(roughly 33%) while the number of fan complaints has seemingly risen in like manner.
If â€œRubbinâ€™s Racinâ€™â€ then maybe many of the 160,000 who used to pile into the high banked, half-mile facility considered â€œWreckinâ€™ Racinâ€™â€ as well. No wrecks may very well equal no excitement to some, which may be why there were vast numbers of empty seats earlier this year in the northeastern corner of Tennessee.
While there is something to be said for not having to watch the pace car lead the field around for 100 laps or more, fans did not always seem to mind the caution laps they got in exchange for the grinding action they saw to lead to those yellow flags.
Whatever the case may be, there is at least the possibility that fewer wrecks may be a factor to have driven fans away from Bristol.
Another track that was criticized this season, at least by some, was Talladega. Again the question, is it because there werenâ€™t the same number or type of wrecks involved in this yearâ€™s race? To say that people donâ€™t expect wrecks at the massive speedway would be preposterous. The television network promote â€˜The Big Oneâ€™ in all their advertising leading into the races there. The track itself markets concession items and souvenirs apparel with that same phrase attached.
There certainly were accidents in the most recent Talladega race but the two by two style of racing did not lend itself to the twenty car pile ups the track has seen in the past.
Was part of the post-race disappointment from fan commentators due to the fact that â€˜The Big Oneâ€™ never came?
I do not believe true race fans go to races just to see crashes. And I absolutely do not believe any true fan wants to see someone hurt. I do, however, believe fans are not always disappointed to see an incident or two that might add a little excitement to the event.
Iâ€™m not sure that this yearâ€™s races at Bristol and Talladega prove anything about the relationship of excitement at the race track and wrecks. However, it does seem to be a strange coincidence that those two tracks drew the greatest amount of ire after their conclusions.
Follow @RacingWithRich on twitter and Facebook by clicking on the icon of either social network on the left side of the page.
Please check out other stories of interest under â€˜Richâ€™s Articles and Blogsâ€™ in the left hand column of this page.
Topics: Articles |