Click on the DirtonDirt.com logo below for the most complete Dirt Late Model coverage anywhere

*********************

Rich's Articles & Blogs

Meta


« Goodyear not the only ones to blame | Main | Harvick, Kenseth and Vickers hurt most by Indy debacle »

Is “The Brickyard” still special?

By admin | July 27, 2008

By Richard Allen

 

In 1994 when stock cars made their first appearance at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway it seemed like a big deal, and it was.

At that time NASCAR was in the process of leaving all other forms of American motor sports well behind. As the unquestioned leader of the U.S. racing scene NASCAR should have been racing on America’s, or rather the world’s, biggest racing stage. And more, open wheel racing, formerly the sole proprietor of IMS, was in the process of tearing itself apart.

Now, is racing at “The Brickyard” still a special event for stock cars?

After yesterday’s race this may not be a fair question, or maybe it is.

With the reduced speed, conservation and pit stop contest held there on Sunday it would be difficult to find many who could argue in favor of this track being good for the sport of stock car racing. After all, this is a race on a track which is not conducive to competitive racing. Cars often get strung out and there is very little passing or side by side racing.

And more, the pit road is too narrow for these big heavy cars which often causes contending cars to be knocked out of contention while not even on the race track.

Granted, the track is steeped in racing tradition and as a history teacher I am a big fan of tradition. However, that tradition is not for this kind of racing.

The Indianapolis 500 is the biggest racing event in the world because of that tradition. That event can get by with a bad race or two and still keep fans coming back because so much of the event is based on things that take place before the race even starts.

Stock car racing at “The Brickyard” depends much more on the level of competition than does the other race held on this track.

NASCAR has found a bit of an historical niche with the kissing of the bricks but that does not really make up for the typical lack of good racing.

This race is often called the second biggest event on the NASCAR schedule, and at one time it was. Now, however, with that point I must respectfully disagree. I consider the Coca-Cola 600, Talladega, Darlington and maybe even the Bristol night race to be bigger than this race. I know the purse is a good one but it takes more than prize money to make an event special.

I wholeheartedly believe NASCAR should be racing at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway. But in my mind at least, “The Brickyard” has lost a bit of its significance over time, and the 2008 version is not going to help it regain any of its former prominence.

Richard Allen is a member of the National Motorsports Press Association. His weekly column appears in The Mountain Press every Wednesday.

Topics: Articles |

2 Responses to “Is “The Brickyard” still special?”

  1. SallyB Says:
    July 28th, 2008 at 5:07 am

    Indy has a storied tradition….for open wheel racing. The big attraction for Nascar running at Indy was the fact that they were the first non open wheel racers to run there. If Nascar wants tradition, they should put the Southern 500 back at Darlington, and go back to racing at rockingham, where their own racing traditions occurred. Unless they’re happy riding on the coattails of open wheelers.

  2. Champ Says:
    July 28th, 2008 at 7:19 am

    I was at the inaugural Brickyard 400.

    I left there with a mixed feelings.

    Indianapolis Motor Speedway was not what I expected.

    The good:

    1. I was at the first NASCAR race ever there.
    2. The locals went out of their way to make us feel welcome.
    3. The race was a nail biter.

    The bad:

    1. For being the historic place that it was, it’s appearance was that of a dingy old race track.
    2. There are very few “good” seats there,
    3. When I say few good seats, I really mean that there are very few seats where you can see more than 50% of the track.

    On 1st day qualifying (remember 1st day qualifying?), I talked with a local Indy fan in the stands (in one of the few seats that you can actually see more than 75% of the track) and he asked me what I thought so far.

    My response then was: Well, they need to tear down the infield grandstand, the Pagoda and then cut down those trees blocking the view of the race track if they want to provide NASCAR fans with a venue that will excite them.

    His response was: They’ll never do that.

    I’ve never gone back to Indy - even when offered tickets for free. I have averaged 2 cup races each year since 1993 - and I won’t waste the travel time (Indy is one of the closest tracks to me) to watch a race that can be seen better on a 13″ TV.

    Give me back the historic Southern 500 at Darlington, The Rock, Hickory…

    We’ve done Indy, and it’s just not a good NASCAR racing venue.

Comments